9.2 C
Monday, October 3, 2022
HomeUncategorizedDisaster capitalism, the shock doctrine and forced migration


Related stories

Lesotho reforms hang in the balance ahead of elections

Lesotho citizens are going to the polls on 7...

Young People and Mental Health Matters

By young Ryan Baraka Mariga Okemwa Hello, My name is Ryan,...

How do Sikhs Celebrate their Wedding?

By Raveena Hargun A Sikh wedding ceremony begins with Roka...

Art & Culture

by Wafula Jo Art is more than just a pretty...

Overcoming Gender Based Violence – by Chloe Jones

Utulivu Women's community Thursday conversations continue to unite Mojatu...

Mojatu Foundation

You might wonder, what on earth is disaster capitalism and the shock doctrine ? 

Let me explain: 

The “shock doctrine” is a political strategy that consists in using the public disorientation following large-scale crises and disasters – wars, natural disasters, pandemics – (in other words massive collective shocks) to push through policies that systematically deepen inequality, enrich elites and which would normally never be accepted in ordinary circumstances. It uses the public’s disorientation following a collective shock to push through radical pro-corporate measures, often called “shock therapy”. 

Shock tactics follow a clear pattern: wait for a crisis, declare a moment of what is sometimes referred to as “extraordinary politics”, suspend some, or all, democratic norms – and then force the corporate wishlist throughout hastily.

The term Disaster capitalism is described by Naomi Klein in her book The Shock Doctrine (2007) as the way that private industries spring up to directly profit from large-scale crises. Capitalism uses disasters and catastrophes to privatize new sectors of society and imposes free-market reforms, creating private company profits but failing in terms of democracy, fairness, and justice. It hids behind situations that create hardship for people, profiting from the collective shock. 

This concept of disaster and crisis profiteering isn’t new. In her book, Naomi argues that it really intensated under the Bush administration after 9/11. The aftermath of 9/11 left Americans disoriented and in shock. The Bush administration seized the collective shock and fear felt by Americans after the attack and declared this sort of never-ending security crisis, privatizing security state, launching the ‘War on Terror’ , and enabling the “Patriot Act” which violated many constitutional rights. 

Homeland security is now a $200 billion industry. Homeland security companies gained a lot thanks to the atmosphere of crisis and fear that was being spread through media outlets. 

(The patriot Act is a Anti-terrorism law, passed by the United States Congress and signed by George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The purpose of the USA Patriot Act is to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world

It gives the government rights to look at records on an individual’s activity held by third parties, allows security services to access computer data held by individuals and businesses without prior authorization and without notifying users.)

Now you might wonder, how does that applies to the so called ‘refugee crisis’ ? 

Refugee flow is a thematic that has already gained worldwide attention. In 2015, Greece was the main entry point for over one million refugees, forced migrants and migrants who fled to Europe by sea. 

1,000,573 people reached Europe across the Mediterranean, mainly to Greece and Italy that year. A further 34,000 crossed from Turkey into Bulgaria and Greece by land, according to the UNCHR

The number of people displaced by war and conflict was in 2015 the highest seen in Western and Central Europe since the Balkan crises of the 1990s. (UNHCR) This period is known as the ‘European migrant crisis’, aka the so called ‘refugee crisis’. 

And much like any other “disaster,” the crisis has been and is continuously exploited for political and economic purposes, it is the perfect excuse for governments to push through radical agendas, as we have seen unraveling over the past few years. 

Policy makers within Europe have used the“ refugee crisis” to push for more restrictive, selective, and securitised immigration law and border control. 

Then, the pandemic happened. And for governments, it was the perfect opportunity to push through even more radical agendas. Another ‘disaster’.

Earlier this year, for instance, the Eu started experimenting with new digital measure to prevent people from crossing, with the Greek border police firing bursts of deafening noise from an armored truck over the frontier into Turkey. Using “sound cannon,” to protect its borders. This was part of new experimental digital barriers that were being tested during the quiet months of the coronavirus pandemic and installed while Europe was still dealing with disorientation and shock in the middle of a pandemic. 

During the pandemic, EU member states have used illegal operations to push back at least 40,000 asylum seekers from Europe’s borders. Their methods have been linked to the death of more than 2,000 people, an article from Guardian revealed following investigations. Using the pandemic to both push through their agendas and ‘protect’ the borders. 

Meanwhile, private companies have secured and made profits through providing technology and infrastructure to help strengthen border enforcement, but also through providing services that have help different country, house, feed, detain, and also deport arriving people, making ‘illegal’ border crossing their core business idea: Private security companies, defense contractors, and others. Capitalising on crisis.  


- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories